Drawing for ALLUTO

USPTO serial 88884566

ALLUTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KLUWE, CHERYL D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALLUTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Sommers

Mark Sommers FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP901 NEW YORK AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable automotive infotainment computer software platforms for automakers, fleet operators, shared mobility service providers and in-vehicle infotainment ("IVI") manufacturers that provides production ready digital cockpit, IVI, rear-side entertainment, and ride-hailing systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 2021DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 21, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 23, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 23, 2021DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 22, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance