Drawing for SAFE-T-SECURE ANALYTICS

USPTO serial 88886568

SAFE-T-SECURE ANALYTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, MICHAEL J.
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFE-T-SECURE ANALYTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Natasha Reed

Natasha Reed FOLEY HOAG LLP1301 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, 25TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Analyzing quality metric data in the field of health care for health care providers for business purposes; business services, namely, providing revenue management services and business reports for health care providers; business consulting services in the field of health care database management and revenue management for health care providersACTIVE—
036Financial consultancy in the field of healthACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, data automation and collection service using proprietary software to analyze data in the field of healthcare for health care providers; scientific research in the field of health care deliveryACTIVE—
044Consulting services in the field of healthACTIVE—
045Analyzing statistical health data in field of healthcare for health care providers in order to uncover and identify health care fraud and claims errorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 15, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 2, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance