USPTO serial 88887380
DATA SCIENCE RESPONSIBILITY MODEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DATA SCIENCE RESPONSIBILITY MODEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Park City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shuo Che Chou
Shuo Che Chou SINORICA LLC DBA THOUGHTS TO PAPER20251 CENTURY BLVD STE 140GERMANTOWN, MD 20874UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Development of voluntary standards for data science processes, evaluation of fairness, ethics, BIAS accountability, transparency, explainability and responsibility of data science processes; Testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others to determine conformity with certification standards; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of the goods of others to assure compliance with industry standards; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of the knowledge, skills and abilities of others in the field of data science processes, evaluation of fairness, ethics, BIAS accountability, transparency, explainability and responsibility of data science processes to determine conformity with certification standards; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of data science processes, evaluation of fairness, ethics, BIAS accountability, transparency, explainability and responsibility of data science processes to assure compliance with industry standards; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of data science processes, evaluation of fairness, ethics, BIAS accountability, transparency, explainability and responsibility of data science processes to determine conformity with certification standards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |