Drawing for DOT DOT DOT

USPTO serial 88889080

DOT DOT DOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINSON, JENNIFER ELLE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOT DOT DOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MELANIE HOWARD

MELANIE HOWARD LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD., SUITE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Provide a downloadable mobile or desktop application to provide a social and community platform focused on well-being and community for users to access news and information in the fields of technology, ethics and humanities, none of the foregoing relating to or promoting video games or computer games, all of the foregoing (except as expressly permitted above) excluding in the fields of consumer electronics, interoperability standards, wireless standards and communications technologyACTIVEDec 15, 2019
042Designing and developing websites for others in the fields of current event news, technology and society, politics, mental wellbeing, entertainment, ethics, communication technologies, humanities technology, ethics technology, well-being technology; Consulting services in the field of information technology, specifically, ethical practices in the use and implementation of technology and the broader impact of technology on society, excluding the fields of consumer electronics or interoperability standards, all of the foregoing (except as expressly permitted above) excluding in the fields of consumer electronics, interoperability standards, wireless standards and communications technologyACTIVEJan 1, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 19, 2023NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 18, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 18, 2023DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 13, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 1, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 25, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 19, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2022TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Mar 15, 2022OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 15, 2022OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 14, 2022OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 28, 2021CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 19, 2021EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 15, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance