USPTO serial 88889952
HOTEL STARLINO SELEZIONE DI DAL 1906 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TELEF. +39 011 689 1411 TORINO ITALY MADE IN ITALIA HOTEL STARLINO 1906
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOTEL STARLINO SELEZIONE DI DAL 1906 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TELEF. +39 011 689 1411 TORINO ITALY MADE IN ITALIA HOTEL STARLINO 1906?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER NUSSBAUM
Peter Nussbaum CHIESA SHAHINIAN & GIANTOMASI PCONE BOLAND DRIVEWEST ORANGE, NJ 07052UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines, namely, vermouth and aperitif produced from grapes and botanicals from the Torino, Italy region in accordance with adopted standards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Biggar & Leith, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named HOTEL STARLINO SELEZIONE DI DAL 1906 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TELEF. +39 011 689 1411 TORINO ITALY MADE IN ITALIA HOTEL STARLINO 1906
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |