Drawing for FIRST DROP

USPTO serial 88894052

FIRST DROP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NICHOLSON, KERRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRST DROP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Flior

Andrew S. Flior SNELL & WILMER LLP600 ANTON BLVD., STE. 1400COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Investment funding services to emerging and start-up companies; Investment advisory services; Investment funding and venture capital funding in the field of technology, hardware, and mobile applications; Venture capital advisory servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 21, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2020GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 29, 2020GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 29, 2020CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 22, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance