USPTO serial 88901855
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Reichenthal
MARK I. REICHENTHAL BRANFMAN MAYFIELD BUSTARDE REICHENTHAL LLP462 STEVENS AVENUE, SUITE 303SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Automobile cleaning preparations, namely, antimicrobial coatings to treat the growth of mold, mildew, bacteria and fungus on various surfaces; antimicrobial preparations for inhibiting mold, mildew and bacteria on various surfaces; deodorizing cleaning preparations; Antimicrobial coatings to treat the growth of mold, mildew, bacteria and fungus on various surfaces; antimicrobial preparations for inhibiting mold, mildew and bacteria on various surfaces; deodorizing cleaning preparations; disinfectant bathroom cleaners; disinfectants for sanitary purposes for use in healthcare, industrial, residential and commercial facilities; disinfectants for sanitary purposes; disinfectants for hygienic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |