USPTO serial 88903679
SPEAKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSS, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEAKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William B. Nash
William B. Nash HAYNES AND BOONE LLP2323 VICTORY AVENUE, SUITE 700DALLAS, TX 75219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Scotch whisky; whisky; whiskey; gin; vodka | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2022 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |