USPTO serial 88905288
SK MAGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIFTU, BENIAM
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SK MAGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIANE J MASON
DIANE J MASON FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPFOUR EMBARCADERO CENTER27TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Household air cleaner, not being parts of machines; household air cleaners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |