Drawing for MOONSHOT

USPTO serial 88912294

MOONSHOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, DONALD
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOONSHOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kazuyo Morita

Kazuyo Morita HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. BOX 8749ATTN: TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Cheese and cracker combinations; fruit-based raw food bars; dried fruits; dried fruit mixes; roasted nuts, seasoned nuts; trail mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds, and dried fruits; chips, namely, potato chips, vegetable chips, vegetable and legume based chipsACTIVE—
030Chips, namely, tortilla chips, grain chips, multigrain chips, bean chips, pita chips, corn chips, pretzel chips; grain-based chips; food and snack bars, namely, oat bars and granola bars; flour, baking soda, baking powder, corn starch; pantry staples, namely, flour, oats, and rice; trail mix consisting primarily of pretzels, popcorn, and crackersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 4, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 2, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 25, 2022EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 25, 2022EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 25, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2022NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 15, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2022INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Feb 28, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 24, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 30, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 30, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2021EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 15, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance