Drawing for PROVIDING A HUMAN MACHINE EXPERIENCE THAT IS SEAMLESS INTUITIVE INNOVATIVE

USPTO serial 88912843

PROVIDING A HUMAN MACHINE EXPERIENCE THAT IS SEAMLESS INTUITIVE INNOVATIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCPHERSON RAYBURN, SHAVELL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PROVIDING A HUMAN MACHINE EXPERIENCE THAT IS SEAMLESS INTUITIVE INNOVATIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rhett V. Barney

RHETT V. BARNEY LEE & HAYES, PC601 W. RIVERSIDE AVE SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Product development consulting in the field of input control devices, user interfaces, embedded computer hardware and software, control panels, gesture control systems and applications, wireless connectivity technology, and wearable and body enhancement technology; Research and development and consultation related thereto in the field of input control devices, user interfaces, embedded computer hardware and software, control panels, gesture control systems and applications, wireless connectivity technology, and wearable and body enhancement technology; Technology consultation in the field of input control devices, user interfaces, embedded computer hardware and software, control panels, gesture control systems and applications, wireless connectivity technology, and wearable and body enhancement technologyACTIVEApr 15, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 18, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 15, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance