USPTO serial 88914168
MEL'S HOT DOGS FEATURING REAL CHICAGO STYLE HOT DOGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEL'S HOT DOGS FEATURING REAL CHICAGO STYLE HOT DOGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN
Joseph J. Weissman JOHNSON POPE BOKOR RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP401 E. JACKSON STREET, SUITE 3100TAMPA, FL 33602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant Services | ACTIVE | Sep 10, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |