Drawing for MEL'S HOT DOGS FEATURING REAL CHICAGO STYLE HOT DOGS

USPTO serial 88914168

MEL'S HOT DOGS FEATURING REAL CHICAGO STYLE HOT DOGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEL'S HOT DOGS FEATURING REAL CHICAGO STYLE HOT DOGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN

Joseph J. Weissman JOHNSON POPE BOKOR RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP401 E. JACKSON STREET, SUITE 3100TAMPA, FL 33602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant ServicesACTIVESep 10, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 9, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 9, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 22, 2022EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 10, 2021RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Nov 19, 2021GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2021GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2021CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 7, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 24, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 24, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 24, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 24, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 27, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 27, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 27, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 16, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance