USPTO serial 88914665
GRIP LOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NKOJO, RHODA K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRIP LOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tracy B. Gray
Tracy B. Gray HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. BOX 8749ATTN: TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201-8749Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing business information in the fields of social media analytics, real time data and video analytics | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring a computer software platform for displaying location-specific information, namely, interactive digital restaurant menus, customized retail establishment recommendations, geographic location information about retail establishments, location information about where users are located when using retail and business services, information about specific retail establishments, namely, physical location, menu information, hours of operation, contact details, directions, trends in customer density, density at specific retail establishments, event-specific and location-specific notifications and alerts, video imagery, social media integration; providing a website featuring on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to access social media analytics, real time data and video analytics in the field of customer relationship management and consumer behavior; providing a website featuring on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to engage in managed conversations, access online conversation analytics, and comment on predictive restaurant reservation and non-reservation wait times through the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and perform social media integrations that allow businesses to understand consumer reviews, feedback, and comments about the businesses through the use of artificial intelligence and machine vision, perform natural language processing, and access live video camera feeds for single and multiple locations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |