USPTO serial 88915014
BREWSKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HA, PAULINE T.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREWSKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin White
17352 Derian AveLegalIrvine, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Equipment sold as a unit for playing drinking games comprised of an apparatus for holding multiple cups | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 16, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |