USPTO serial 88916364
MAGNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 692
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHLEGELMILCH, JONATHON A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aurora, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Leonard
Michael J. Leonard FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 LENOX DRIVE, BLDG. 3LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2311United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radar apparatus; radar object detectors for use on vehicles; lidar apparatus; laser object detectors for use on vehicles; lasers for measuring; electronic proximity sensors and switches; electronic controllers for vehicle driving assistance; control units for automated and semi-automated driving of vehicles; advanced driver assistance systems for vehicles, namely, adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning and controls, blind spot detection warning and controls, and accident and collision mitigating warning and controls; computer software and computer hardware for use in connection with advanced driver assistance systems; computer software and computer hardware for the control, operation, steering, and monitoring of vehicles; computer software and computer hardware for enabling object detection, object classification, and high definition mapping; computer software and computer hardware for performing data acquisition and data analytics; computer software and computer hardware for collecting and analyzing data generated by vehicle sensors and external sources; computer software and computer hardware for transmission of data within a vehicle and for communications between and among vehicles and a cloud-based platform; computer software and computer hardware for controlling vehicle communications networks; computer software and computer hardware for enabling interaction and interface between vehicles and mobile devices; computer software for coordinating transportation, freight, and delivery services by automated vehicles; computer software for vehicle fleet management; computer software for vehicle navigation; navigation apparatus for vehicles; global positioning system (GPS) apparatus; infotainment systems for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2025 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |