USPTO serial 88918684
NRS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NRS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean D. Flaherty
Sean D. Flaherty GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP101 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 2000SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automotive parts, namely, brakes for automotive vehicles and parts and fittings for vehicle brakes, disc brakes, drum brakes, disc brake backing plates, drum brake backing plates, and brake pads, brake shoes for automotive use | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Distributorship services in the field of automotive parts, disc brakes, drum brakes, disc brake backing plates, drum brake backing plates, and brake pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of disc brakes, drum brakes, disc brake backing plates, drum brake backing plates, and brake pads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |