USPTO serial 88918758
CELLTRITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELLTRITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL N. SMITH
DANIEL N. SMITH NEW ENGLAND PATENT & TRADEMARK301 EDGEWATER PLACE, SUITE 100WAKEFIELD, MA 01880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin creams; Lip balms; Skin lotion; Massage oil; Facial lotions; Body lotions; Facial cream; Under eye enhancers; Bath bombs; Skin and body topical lotions, creams, non-medicated ointments for cosmetic purposes, skin moisturizers, facial cleansers, lip balms, under eye enhancers, and oils for cosmetic use; all of the aforementioned containing legal hemp oil solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; the foregoing goods do not contain cannabidiol (CBD) | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |