USPTO serial 88921038
DIGITAL.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KEENE, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ON, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D. Kendall
Matthew D. Kendall GARDNER, LINN, BURKHART & ONDERSMA LLP2900 CHARLEVOIX DR., SE, SUITE 300GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the sale of goods and services of others by arranging and conducting advertising and marketing events, conferences, and seminars for third parties; job posting services, namely, providing an on-line searchable database featuring employment opportunities | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting seminars for promoting the sale of goods and services of others; providing educational training in the field of sponsorship programs; book publishing in the field of current technology news; providing an online nondownloadable publication in the nature of books, magazines, and newsletters in the field of reviews of computer and mobile device technology, innovations, products, services, businesses, and management in the fields of technology, internet and mobile device technology, internet products and services for third parties; desktop publishing for others of reviews of technology, innovations, products, services, businesses, management for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KONRAD GROUP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DIGITAL RESEARCH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Techvibes Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DIGITAL.
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |