USPTO serial 88925583
AGILEMENTORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGILEMENTORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Perry
DAVID M. PERRY BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQUARE8TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users; providing an on-line forum for exchanging information on software development, product development, project management, agile and scrum; providing on-line question and answer forums and video sessions | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | providing on-line non-downloadable videos featuring questions and answers in the field of software development, product development, project management, agile and scrum; providing a website that features information about software development, product development, project management, agile and scrum; providing a website featuring resources, namely, non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles, podcasts, interviews, videos, and weekly tips in the field of software development, product development, project management, agile and scrum; providing education courses in the fields of software development, product development, project management, agile and scrum, offered in-person, online, and through non-downloadable videos; Interactive on-line training services in the fields of software development, product development, project management, agile and scrum; Providing on-line training courses and videos in the fields of software development, product development, project management, agile and scrum | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions and get feedback from their peers; providing a website featuring technology that enables users to share, bookmark, index, store, collect and showcase content, articles, podcasts, interviews, videos, and other information resources in electronic form in the fields of software development, product development, project management, agile and scrum; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others learning and practicing techniques in the fields of software development, product development, project management, agile and scrum | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |