USPTO serial 88925757
NAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, LUCY E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fountain Valley, CA
Fountain Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael W. Schroeder
Michael W. Schroeder REYES & SCHROEDER ASSOCIATES, P.C.13225 Philadelphia St.Ste AWhittier, CA 90601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Pickles; Dried fruits; Dried vegetables; Dried fruit mixes; Dried fruit-based snacks; Fruit-based snack foods; Fruit and date rolls consisting of dried fruits, nuts, and spices; Vegetable-based snack foods; Processed nuts; Prepared nuts; Nut-based snack foods; Seed-based snack foods; Processed edible seeds, not being seasonings or flavorings; Trail mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds and dried fruit; Fruit juices and vegetable juices for cooking | ABANDONED | Oct 14, 2019 |
| 030 | Spices; Spice blends; Seasonings; Dried herbs; Processed herbs; Granola; Granola snacks; Granola-based snack bars; Grain-based snack foods; Cereal-based snack foods; Processed seeds for use as seasoning; Sauces; Sauce mixes; Rock Candy; Candy; Popcorn | ABANDONED | Oct 14, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |