USPTO serial 88926563
AHNR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHEATLEY, TRAVIS DWIGHT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AHNR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric fruit presses; Electric whisks for household purposes; Electric mixers; Fruit presses, electric, for household purposes; Grating machines for vegetables; Kitchen machines, namely, electric standing mixers; Meat and food grinder attachments for electric mixers for household use; Mixing machines; Sausage making machines; Tin openers, electric; Vegetable grating machines; Whisks, electric, for household purposes; Electric food preparation apparatus, namely, tumblers for marinating food; Electric fruit presses for household use; Electric fruit presses for industrial purposes; Electric meat grinders; Electric food blenders; Electric food blenders; Electric garlic peeling machines; Power-operated basket presses; Power-operated flour mills; Power-operated meat grinders; Power-operated meat mincers | ACTIVE | Jan 12, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 31, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2024 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2021 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |