USPTO serial 88928274
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL LAW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL LAW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of journals, magazines, articles, books, journals, and manuals in the field of legal engineering; Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of journals, magazines, articles, books, journals, and manuals in the field of computational law; Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of journals, magazines, articles, books, journals, and manuals in the field of law, technology, software, and public policy | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of journals, magazines, articles, books, journals, and manuals in the field of legal engineering; Non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of journals, magazines, articles, books, journals, and manuals in the field of computational law; Non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of journals, magazines, articles, books, journals, and manuals in the field of law, technology, software, and public policy; Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of law, technology, software, and public policy; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring articles in the field of legal engineering; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring articles in the field of computational law; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring articles in the fields of law, technology, software, and public policy; Production of podcasts; Providing online non-downloadable journals in the field of legal engineering; Providing online non-downloadable journals in the field of computational law; Providing online non-downloadable journals in the field of law, technology, software, and public policy; Publication of journals; Publication of books, magazines, almanacs and journals; Publication of texts, books, journals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |