USPTO serial 88928901
BACKSTOP INTELLX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYANT, ALEXANDRIA N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BACKSTOP INTELLX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK A. PASKAR
Mark A. Paskar BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP211 NORTH BROADWAY, SUITE 3600ST. LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software-as-a-service (SaaS) services for the institutional investment industry featuring software for the purpose of standardizing the transmission between investment fund managers and institutional asset owners of regulatory, legal, and due diligence documents, compliance and operating policies, requests for proposal, and offering documents; software-as-a-service (SaaS) services for the institutional investment industry featuring software using artificial intelligence in automating the filing and indexing of relevant data and information identified in regulatory, legal, and due diligence documents, compliance and operating policies, requests for proposal, and offering documents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 31, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |