USPTO serial 88929900
BULLY MUNCHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BULLY MUNCHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami, FL
Miami, FL
Smithtown, NY
Smithtown, NY
Araguaina, Tocantins, BR
Araguaina, Tocantins, BR
Araguaina, Tocantins, BR
Araguaina, Tocantins, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WALTER J. TENCZA, JR.
WALTER J. TENCZA, JR. WALTER J. TENCZA JR.100 MENLO PARKSUITE 210EDISON, NJ 08837Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | goods, namely, edible dog treats, and edible dog chews | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EDUARDO RATINETZ
- Other trademarks owned by EDUARDO RATINETZ
- Other trademarks owned by GARY JACOBS
- Other trademarks owned by GARY JACOBS
- Other trademarks owned by TIAGO VERONEZE
- Other trademarks owned by TIAGO VERONEZE
- Other trademarks owned by EZEQUIEL VERONEZE
- Other trademarks owned by EZEQUIEL VERONEZE
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named BULLY MUNCHER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |