USPTO serial 88934576
NUVO-LID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUVO-LID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GABRIELLE S. ROTH
GABRIELLE S. ROTH SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW, SUITE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Aluminum die cut lids; printed and non-printed lidding films made of aluminum foil for packaging purposes; flexible packaging materials made from aluminum foil | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Custom fabrication for others of aluminum die cut lids, printed and non-printed lidding films made of aluminum foil for packaging purposes and flexible packaging materials made from aluminum foil; manufacturing for others of aluminum die cut lids, printed and nonprinted lidding films made of aluminum foil for packaging purposes and flexible packaging materials made from aluminum foil | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Custom design for others of aluminum die cut lids, printed and non-printed lidding films made of aluminum foil and flexible packaging materials made from aluminum foil | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 4, 2020 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 4, 2020 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |