Drawing for C15

USPTO serial 88936999

C15

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NICHOLSON, KERRY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C15?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. ERIC MILLS

E. Eric Mills NEXSEN PRUET, PLLC4141 PARKLAKE AVENUESUITE 200RALEIGH, NC 27612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Air purifiersACTIVEMay 1, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 27, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 12, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 12, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 25, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 1, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2022CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 31, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 31, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 30, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 31, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2022CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2021CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2021SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 10, 2021IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 10, 2021EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 8, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 28, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 28, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 27, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance