USPTO serial 88937274
LEFTOVERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEFTOVERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. Melanson
Lisa M. Melanson MCCARTHY TÉTRAULT LLP745 THURLOW STREETSUITE 2400VANCOUVER, BC, V6E0C5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for coordinating, scheduling and tracking the transport and delivery of food | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transport and delivery of food; providing information regarding collection, transport and delivery of food via a mobile application and a website | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for coordinating, scheduling and tracking the transport and delivery of food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |