Drawing for LINEUP

USPTO serial 88937486

LINEUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LINEUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary A. Hecht

Gary A. Hecht FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 Lenox DrivePrinceton Pike Corporate CenterLawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use by businesses in the restaurant industry to analyze historical sales data, market data and customer data to forecast and provide predictions of revenue, and of food and labor requirements of the businessACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 30, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 30, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 15, 2022EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 15, 2022EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 15, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 17, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 17, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 17, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 22, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 17, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 20, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 19, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 19, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 5, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 5, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 24, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 24, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 17, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 1, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance