USPTO serial 88937826
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather Balmat
Heather Balmat BALMAT LAW, PLLC977 SEMINOLE TRAIL, #342CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Weatherstripping for use in homes and buildings, door weather seal system composed primarily of non-metal components, namely, weather seals, weatherizing membranes, and vapor barriers, and also containing metal components, namely, jamb and header substrates, mounting hardware and door hardware, weatherstripping in the nature of door sweeps, garage door weather seals, door weather seals for installation on the bottom or underneath the door | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Floor trims and floor moldings made of wood, aluminum, or vinyl, non-metal thresholds | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |