USPTO serial 88939527
DYNAMIC REAL ESTATE EXPERIENCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNAMIC REAL ESTATE EXPERIENCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Forest Hill, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Noelle Byrd
1020 N HIGHLAND ST, UNIT 324ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business project management services; Business project management services for construction projects; Business advisory services in the fields of architecture, interior design and urban planning design; Professional business consultancy; Professional business consulting; Project management services for others for business purposes in the fields of architecture, interior design, urban planning design | ACTIVE | May 27, 2020 |
| 036 | Financial consultation in the field of technology; Financial consultation in the field of real estate; Real estate appraisal; Real estate consultancy; Real estate consultation; Real estate management consultation; Real estate management services; Appraisal of real estate; Financial consulting | ACTIVE | May 27, 2020 |
| 037 | Construction project management services | ACTIVE | May 27, 2020 |
| 042 | Architectural design in the field of digital technology; Technological planning and consulting services in the field of real estate; Technological planning and consulting services in the field of architecture; Consulting in the fields of engineering and architecture | ACTIVE | May 27, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Byrd, William R
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DYNAMIC REAL ESTATE EXPERIENCES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |