USPTO serial 88945945
CAT-I
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLEBBE, KEVIN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAT-I?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, AB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca L. Wilson
Rebecca L. Wilson THE DOBRUSIN LAW FIRM, P.C.29 WEST LAWRENCE STREETSUITE 210PONTIAC, MI 48342Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, books in the fields of usability engineering, document engineering, industrial engineering, workplace safety, operational policies and procedures, compliance, technical writing, conflict management and negotiation strategies; printed publications, namely, training course materials in the fields of usability engineering, document engineering, industrial engineering, workplace safety, operational policies and procedures, compliance, technical writing, conflict management and negotiation strategies; reference books in the field of usability engineering, document engineering, industrial engineering, workplace safety, operational policies and procedures, compliance, technical writing, conflict management and negotiation strategies; educational books in the fields of usability engineering, document engineering, industrial engineering, workplace safety, operational policies and procedures, compliance, technical writing, conflict management and negotiation strategies | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Consulting services in the fields of business management, human resources, and business organizational design, namely, workplace safety, operational policies and procedures, workflow management, compliance and technical writing | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational, training and instructional services, namely, providing educational courses, seminars, and workshops in the fields of usability engineering, document engineering, industrial engineering, workplace safety, operational policies and procedures, workflow management, compliance, technical writing, conflict management and negotiation strategies; training in the use and operation of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 29, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |