USPTO serial 88946823
SILK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAGLIARDI, JEANINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Vern
405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software and cloud computer servers, all of the foregoing used for storage of information and data in the field of cloud-based data virtualization; none of the above for providing biometric and electronic identification and verification of biometric data, security applications, digital identification and authentication; and none of the above providing coding and decoding of audio and video and electronic signals, recording, transmission or reproduction of sound, images or data, internet communications and peer to peer communications, organizing, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing text, data and audio files on portable and handheld digital electronic devices, internet communications via a computer network, hosting, joining, managing, scheduling and streaming computer network conference calls, and instant messaging via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software, in the nature of application software for cloud computing, cloud computing software, and application software for cloud computing services, all for storage of information and data in the field of cloud-based data virtualization; none of the above for providing biometric and electronic identification and verification of biometric data, security applications, database access, digital identification and authentication; and none of the above providing coding and decoding of audio and video and electronic signals, recording, transmission or reproduction of sound, images or data, internet communications and peer to peer communications, organizing, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing text, data and audio files on portable and handheld digital electronic devices, internet communications via a computer network, hosting, joining, managing, scheduling and streaming computer network conference calls, and instant messaging via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kaminario Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by THE SILK TECHNOLOGIES ILC LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SILK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 9, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |