USPTO serial 88946826
BEZOS ACADEMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, SHANNON B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEZOS ACADEMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW ROPPEL
ANDREW ROPPEL HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. BOX 8749ATTN: TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201-8749Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All-purpose sport bags; tote bags; shoulder bags; handbags; beach bags; bookbags; backpacks; duffel bags; umbrellas; gym bags; knapsacks; luggage; school bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing and clothing accessories, namely, jackets, pants, coats, shorts, tank tops, sweatpants, belts, swimwear, socks, scarves; headwear, namely, caps, visors, headbands; footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 17, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | AAUW | ALLEGED AMENDMENT TO USE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |