USPTO serial 88955230
VIRUSHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRUSHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mathew J. Temmerman
Mathew J. Temmerman TEMMERMAN LAW50 California St, Suite 1500San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical preparations to be applied to textiles, plastics and coatings for absorbing ultraviolet light | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Disinfectants; hand sanitizing preparations; personal protection equipment, namely, antimicrobial and antiviral treatment kits for fabrics and safety masks comprising antimicrobial preparations for inhibiting bacteria and antiviral disinfectant preparations; Disinfectants for personal protection equipment, namely, masks, gowns, latex gloves, face shields; Disinfectants for hygienic purposes; hand-sanitizing and disinfecting preparations with antimicrobial and antibacterial properties; Disposable wipes impregnated with disinfecting chemicals or compounds therefor for use in hospitals, laboratories, business and personal use; safety masks treated with antimicrobial and antiviral preparations for use by medical personnel | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Protective masks and personal protective equipment not for medical purposes, namely, protective industrial face masks; protective filtration face masks for the prevention of accident or injury for non-medical use; filters for use in masks, namely, filters for non-medical respiratory masks; filters sheets and filter pads for use in masks, namely, filters for non-medical respiratory masks | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Personal protection equipment for medical use, namely, face shields and masks for use by medical personnel; masks used for medical purposes, namely, surgical masks, respiratory masks that filter at least 95 percent of airborne particles and are not resistant to oil, sanitary knit face masks with replaceable nonwoven filtration media, breathing masks, sanitary fabric face masks, face shields, ventilator masks, sanitary masks, pediatric breathing masks, and respiratory masks; Medical treatment apparel and gowns pretreated with antimicrobial and antiviral preparations; fabric face masks, namely, fashion masks being sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; knit face masks, namely, fashion masks being sanitary masks for protection against viral infection | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | modifying chemicals for others, namely, chemical engineering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DE NOVA TECHNOLOGY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ViruShield, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIRUSHIELD
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 27, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |