USPTO serial 88958682
BALISOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BALISOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BURBANK, CA
BURBANK, CA
BURBANK, CA
BURBANK, CA
DENPASAR UTARA, BALI, ID
DENPASAR UTARA, BALI, ID
DENPASAR UTARA, BALI, ID
DENPASAR UTARA, BALI, ID
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic balls; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic masks; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic pads; Cosmetic rouges; Cosmetic soaps; Cream for whitening the skin; Cream soaps; Lotions for cellulite reduction; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Lotions for face and body care; Moisturizing milk; Moisturizing milks; After shave lotions; After sun moisturisers; After-sun lotions; Age retardant lotion; Anti-aging moisturizer; Anti-wrinkle cream; Bar soap; Bath cream; Bath lotion; Bath soaps; Bathing lotions; Beauty lotions; Beauty masks; Beauty soap; Body cream; Body cream soap; Body lotion; Body lotions; Body masks; Body scrub; Body scrubs; Body wash; Body mask cream; Body mask lotion; Boot cream; Cold cream; Cosmetic mud masks; Cosmetic preparations, namely, firming lotions; Cosmetics in the form of milks, lotions and emulsions; Cuticle cream; Eye cream; Eye lotions; Face creams; Face and body lotions; Face milk and lotions; Facial cleansers; Facial cream; Facial creams; Facial lotion; Facial beauty masks; Facial moisturizer with SPF; Facial moisturizers; Facial scrubs; Facial washes; Foot scrubs; Fruit and vegetable wash; Hair lotion; Hair lotions; Hair care lotions; Hand cream; Hand creams; Hand lotions; Hand scrubs; Lip cream; Liquid bath soaps; Make-up removing lotions; Make-up removing milk, gel, lotions and creams; Massage lotions; Moisturising creams; Moisturizing creams; Moisturizing body lotions; Night cream; Non-medicated foot lotions; Non-medicated mouth wash and rinse; Non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin; Perfumed soaps; Polishing creams; Pore tightening mask packs used as cosmetics; Scented body lotions and creams; Shaving cream; Shaving lotion; Shaving lotions; Shoe cream; Skin cleanser in liquid spray form for use as a baby wipe alternative; Skin cleansers; Skin cream; Skin creams; Skin lotion; Skin lotions; Skin masks; Skin moisturizer; Skin moisturizing gel; Skin soap; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin bronzing creams; Skin cleansing lotion; Skin moisturizer masks; Sun care lotions; Sun tan lotion; Sun-block lotions; Sun-tanning oils and lotions; Sunscreen creams; Toning lotion, for the face, body and hands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFELONG SUPPLY, CO.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFELONG SUPPLY, CO.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFELONG SUPPLY, CO.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFELONG SUPPLY, CO.
- Other trademarks owned by PT BALIALUS
- Other trademarks owned by PT BALIALUS
- Other trademarks owned by PT BALIALUS
- Other trademarks owned by PT BALIALUS
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BALISOFT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2020 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |