Drawing for ELEMENTS

USPTO serial 88960239

ELEMENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECKER, MARY ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELEMENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TONIA A. SAYOUR

TONIA A. SAYOUR WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.605 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10158UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Sports trading cardsACTIVEJul 23, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2025MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 12, 2025ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 12, 2025EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2025EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 1, 2024RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Sep 10, 2024GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2024GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2024CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 26, 2024RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Apr 26, 2024RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2024RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Apr 26, 2024GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2024GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2024CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 14, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 14, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 8, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 8, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 19, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 14, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 23, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance