Drawing for OVERLAP

USPTO serial 88961888

OVERLAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OVERLAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean T. Bradley

Sean T. Bradley BRADLEY IP, LLC6320 BROOKSIDE PLAZA, NO 230KANSAS CITY, MO 64113United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Matching organizations with subject matter experts via a computer network; Online matching services for matching organizations with subject matter experts, information products and software applications by utilizing user interfaces, databases, scheduling tools, payment portals, remote conferencing technology, and support personnel; Providing an online marketplace for connecting users with subject matter experts in the green economy, information products and software applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2024EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 18, 2024TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 18, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 18, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 18, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 17, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 15, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 12, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 15, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance