USPTO serial 88961897
THUNDER ALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THUNDER ALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANIL V. GEORGE
Anil V. George NBA PROPERTIES, INC.OLYMPIC TOWER - 645 FIFTH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment and recreational services, namely, organizing and conducting performances in the nature of live show performances and live musical performances, entertainment events in the nature of social entertainment events, basketball events in the nature of basketball games, basketball scrimmages, basketball camps and basketball contests and recreational events in the nature of games, contests, camps, drawings and live trivia contests at a mixed-use development; entertainment district services in the nature of arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes, namely, providing access to multiple entertainment options in the nature of live show performances, live musical performances, basketball games, basketball scrimmages, basketball camps, basketball contests, games, contests, camps, drawings and live trivia in a particular geographic space; all of the foregoing associated with the anchor professional basketball team owned by applicant | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing access to multiple dining options in a particular geographic space, namely, restaurant services provided at or near a sports arena; providing of food and drink via a mobile truck or restaurant; all of the foregoing associated with the anchor professional basketball team owned by applicant | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |