Drawing for BLINK

USPTO serial 88975129

BLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECHHOFER, YOCHEVED D
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Purvi Patel Albers

Purvi Patel Albers Haynes and Boone LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; transcription of audio communications, none of the foregoing services in connection with media production and post-production services in the fields of video and film; arranging subscriptions to telecommunications database services for others; compiling business dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2023EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2023EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 8, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 2, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2022NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 18, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 2, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 17, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 9, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2020FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jun 19, 2020ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 15, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 13, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 12, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 3, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 8, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 1, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance