Drawing for OPTIMUM

USPTO serial 88975555

OPTIMUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6029362Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 7, 2020
Examiner
FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIMUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SEVAG DEMIRJIAN

SEVAG DEMIRJIAN FOUNDATION LAW GROUP4605 LANKERSHIM BLVD, SUITE 650NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA 91602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, computer software application development for others, in the field of litigation software and litigation services; computer system design for others, in the field of litigation software and litigation services; computer software deployment for others, in the field of litigation software and litigation services; computer system and computer software integration and technical consulting, in the field of litigation software and litigation services; hosting online web and cloud facilities for others, in the field of litigation software and litigation services; application service provider featuring web-based litigation software for governance, collecting, storing, sharing, processing, reviewing, searching, managing, categorizing, coding, reporting and presenting documents and management, execution, profiling and prediction of litigationSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDAug 23, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 25, 2022C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Mar 25, 2022CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 24, 2022CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Feb 23, 2022CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Feb 3, 2021PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 24, 2020PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 7, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 21, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 9, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 9, 2019PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Nov 27, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 27, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 27, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 27, 2019ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2019PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 20, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 24, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 16, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 28, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance