USPTO serial 88976300
TAFFER'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAFFER'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN J STRAUSS
STEPHEN J STRAUSS BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-1730UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL BASES; NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS; FRUIT DRINKS; FRUIT-FLAVORED DRINKS; FRUIT JUICES; FRUIT JUICE CONCENTRATES; MIXED FRUIT JUICE | ACTIVE | Jul 17, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 28, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |