USPTO serial 88976391
AISLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, BRITTANY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AISLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lara Pearson
Lara Pearson LAW OFFICE OF LARA PEARSON LTD, PBC774 MAYS BLVD.NO. 10-405INCLINE VILLAGE, NV 89451Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Condoms; incontinence sheets, sex toys; pessaries, medical apparatuses for exercising pelvic floor muscles for use to treat symptoms of urinary incontinence and for therapeutic purposes, menstrual cups and maternity support belts for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |