USPTO serial 88977060
Serial No. 88977060
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 88977060?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHRYN L. BOHMANN
KATHRYN L. BOHMANN ADSERO IP8210 SOUTHPARK TERRACELITTLETON, CO 80120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financing services; Financial analysis; Financial consultancy; Electronic funds transfer; Financial information; Issuance of tokens of value; Providing financial information via a web site | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communications by computer terminals; Computer aided transmission of messages and images; Information about telecommunication; Paging services; Providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; Telecommunications routing and junction services; Providing user access to global computer network; Providing access to databases; Transmission of digital files; Providing online forums for transmission of messages among computer users; Streaming of data; Radio communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Providing a website featuring information about physical storage of electronically stored data or documents; Physical storage of electronically stored data or documents | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical research in the field of computer programming; Telecommunications technology consultancy; Computer programming; Computer software design; Updating of computer software; Consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; Rental of computer software; Recovery of computer data; Maintenance of computer software; Computer systems analysis; Computer system design; Duplication of computer programs; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; Installation of computer software; Data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; Computer software consultancy; Computer virus protection services; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring of computer systems by remote access; Information technology consulting services; Server hosting; Off-site data backup; Electronic data storage; Providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; Cloud computing featuring software for monitoring of computer systems by remote access; Outsource service providers in the field of information technology; Computer technology consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Xeniro Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Xeniro Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |