Drawing for NATIVA

USPTO serial 88977487

NATIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KRISTA WEBER POWELL

KRISTA WEBER POWELL TRASKBRITT PC230 SOUTH 500 EAST, #300SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Plant extracts for medical and pharmaceutical purposes; Plant extracts for pharmaceutical purposes; all of the foregoing containing hemp derived solely from the mature stalks and sterilized seeds of the Cannabis sativa L plant and none of the foregoing containing CBDACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 19, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 30, 2021TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Dec 30, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 30, 2021OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 10, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 21, 2021OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 16, 2020OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 15, 2020OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 15, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 15, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 10, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2019ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 22, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 22, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 16, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance