USPTO serial 88978412
RAW GARDEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAW GARDEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY ZUBER
JEFFREY ZUBER ZUBER LAWLER LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E, SUITE 400LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Electronic cigarettes, all of the foregoing containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Electronic cigarettes, all of the foregoing containing cannabis or cannabis derivatives with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Oral vaporizers for smoking purposes, all of the foregoing containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Oral vaporizers for smoking purposes, all of the foregoing containing cannabis or cannabis derivatives with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Oral vaporizers for smoking purposes, all of the foregoing goods for use in connection with substances containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Oral vaporizers for smoking purposes, all of the foregoing goods for use in connection with substances containing cannabis or cannabis derivatives with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |