USPTO serial 88978491
MOBILE DOG GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2020
- Examiner
- MIRANDA, JOHN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MOBILE DOG GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES KLOBUCAR
James Klobucar GEARHART LAW, LLC41 RIVER ROADSUMMIT, NJ 07901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Pet walking bags, namely, leather walking bags and textile pouches for holding disposable pet waste bags | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2019 |
| 021 | Pet feeding and drinking bowls, portable pet feeding supplies, namely, portable dishes, bowls, food measuring scoops for household purposes, portable pet water containers being automatic pet waterers, and bottles sold empty; food bowl mats being plastic place mats; household storage containers for pet food and treats | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |