Drawing for CORPORATE COACH U

USPTO serial 88978559

CORPORATE COACH U

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORPORATE COACH U?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B.G. Horowitz, Esq.

Robert B.G. Horowitz, Esq. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP45 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA, 14TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Document reproduction; business management analysis and business consultancy; marketing research; market opinion polling studies; compilation of information into computer databases; providing information concerning commercial sales via the Internet; providing information concerning commercial sales; office functions, namely, filing documents or magnetic-tapes; file management with computer databases; providing business assistance to others in the operation of data processing apparatus, namely, computers, typewriters, teletypewriters and other similar office machines; conducting market questionnaire surveys, providing business analysis and evaluation of the survey result, and providing business and marketing information relating thereto including such services provided via the Internet; none of the foregoing services emanating from and/or encompass emanating from an educational institutionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 25, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2021FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Apr 16, 2021ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 15, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 9, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 13, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance