USPTO serial 88978696
CANNA HEMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, ALEXANDRA M.
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANNA HEMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of essential oils, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Natural essential oils, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Terpenes being essential oils, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Essential oils, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Non-medicated skin care creams and lotions, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Non-medicated lip balms, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Non-medicated herbal body care products, namely, body oils, salves, and lip balms, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Nutritional lotions for cosmetic purposes sold as a component of nutritional skin care products for cosmetic purposes, the foregoing goods intended to be applied to the human body or any part thereof for the purpose of cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or cosmetically altering the appearance, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Nourishing lotions for cosmetic purposes sold as a component of nutritional skin care products for cosmetic purposes, the foregoing goods intended to be applied to the human body or any part thereof for the purpose of cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or cosmetically altering the appearance, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Dietary supplements, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Dietary supplements for animals in the nature of orally-consumed nutritional feed supplements for animals, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Dietary supplements for pets in the nature of orally-consumed nutritional feed supplements for animals, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Dietary and nutritional supplements, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Nutritional supplements in lotion form sold as a component of nutritional skin care products, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Medicated lip balm, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Liquid nutritional supplement, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD; Medicinal preparations for the mouth to be applied in the form of drops, capsules, tablets and compressed tablets, the foregoing containing hemp seed oil and not containing CBD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2024 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 8, 2020 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 8, 2020 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |