USPTO serial 88979255
HERBOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HERBOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Debra S. Serota
Debra S. Serota Fish & Richardson, P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, all of the foregoing goods containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, all of the foregoing goods for use in connection with substances containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, derived from Cannabis saliva L plants compliant with the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-334; retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, all of the foregoing goods for use in connection with substances derived from Cannabis saliva L plants compliant with the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-334; retail store services featuring smoking products, all of the foregoing goods containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; retail store services featuring smoking products, all of the foregoing goods for use in connection with substances containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; retail store services featuring smoking products, derived from Cannabis saliva L plants compliant with the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-334; retail store services featuring smoking products, all of the foregoing goods for use in connection with substances derived from Cannabis saliva L plants compliant with the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-334; retail store services featuring medicinal herbs and herbs for medical purposes, all of the foregoing goods containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; retail store services featuring medicinal herbs and herbs for medical purposes, derived from Cannabis saliva L plants compliant with the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-334; retail store services featuring clothing and apparel; on-line retail store services featuring smoking products, all of the foregoing goods containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; on-line retail store services featuring smoking products, all of the foregoing goods for use in connection with substances containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; online retail store services featuring smoking products, derived from Cannabis saliva L plants compliant with the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-334; on-line retail store services featuring smoking products, all of the foregoing goods for use in connection with substances derived from Cannabis saliva L plants compliant with the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-334; on-line retail store services featuring herbs for medical purposes, all of the foregoing goods containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; on-line retail store services featuring herbs for medical purposes, derived from Cannabis saliva L plants compliant with the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-334; on-line retail store services featuring clothing and apparel; on-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, all of the foregoing goods containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; on-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, all of the foregoing goods for use in connection with substances containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; on-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, derived from Cannabis sativa L plants compliant with the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-334; on-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, all of the foregoing goods for use in connection with substances derived from Cannabis sativa L plants compliant with the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-334 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |