Drawing for IGNITE GOOD!

USPTO serial 88979893

IGNITE GOOD!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IGNITE GOOD!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KRISTIN S. CORNUELLE

Kristin S. Cornuelle ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN ST., SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic publications, namely, books, newsletters and magazines featuring educational stories and entertainment for children recorded on computer mediaACTIVEDec 7, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 5, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 20, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2022CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 30, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 30, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 1, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 1, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2021CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2020CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2020SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 15, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 15, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 23, 2020IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 23, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 23, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2020EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 20, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 18, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 18, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 19, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 26, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance